devlog

"But the code base was an order of magnitude smaller and simpler back then, meaning that a fresh port would be at least an order of magnitude harder. Like other respondents, I'm not seeing where we'd get benefits commensurate with the cost."
Heresia! Não consegue? Pede pra sair!

Exgtraido do README da versão 1.0.9 do Postgres95:

"HISTORICAL NOTE

Prior to the current simple C structure definitions, the Node structures
uses a pseudo-inheritance system which automatically generates creator and
accessor functions. Since every node inherits from LispValue, the whole thing
is a mess. Here's a little anecdote:

LispValue definition -- class used to support lisp structures
in C. This is here because we did not want to totally rewrite
planner and executor code which depended on lisp structures when
we ported postgres V1 from lisp to C. -cim 4/23/90"

Olá Boa tarde.
Muito obrigado, O post foi corrigido no ZOom DIgital e queria lhen parabenizar pelo blog realmente está otimo parabens e conte conosco para qualquer coisa.

Att

Muito bom!

Não acho importante ficar reescrevendo as ferramentas usando essa ou aquela linguagem.

Acho importante que haja binds pra essa ou aquela linguagem. ;)

[]'s
Cacilhas, La Batalema